33 tasks. June 4, 2026 closed at 48.1x weighted leverage across 1,301.0 human-equivalent hours in 1,622 minutes of wall-clock time. Supervisory leverage came in at 500.4x.
That is 32.5 weeks of human-equivalent throughput in 27.0 hours. The ceiling was 174.2x; the floor was 5.0x. 31 of the 33 entries came from a single project.
Task Log
| # | Task | Human Est. | Claude | Sup. | Factor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Audit and review | 180.0h | 62m | 3m | 174.2x |
| 2 | Implemented ~220 AVIAN [ip] claims (Apps A-GG) from audit baseline to 441/718 wired via ~28 parallel agents + shared-file integration wiring; full unit suite 5842 passing | 700.0h | 316m | 12m | 132.9x |
| 3 | Audit and review | 100.0h | 55m | 4m | 109.1x |
| 4 | Documentation | 130.0h | 105m | 2m | 74.3x |
| 5 | Harden [ip]+diagram audit specs (4 gap-closing checks) and run proactive 8-agent semantic/legal sweep across all CIP drafts; apply ~28 calibrated overclaim/self-contradiction/grammar/cross-ref fixes | 12.0h | 25m | 3m | 28.8x |
| 6 | Testing | 14.0h | 30m | 1m | 28.0x |
| 7 | Coding | 8.0h | 18m | 3m | 26.7x |
| 8 | Coding | 16.0h | 38m | 5m | 25.3x |
| 9 | Coding | 12.0h | 42m | 5m | 17.1x |
| 10 | Coding | 8.0h | 35m | 5m | 13.7x |
| 11 | Coding | 8.0h | 35m | 5m | 13.7x |
| 12 | Coding | 4.0h | 22m | 5m | 10.9x |
| 13 | Coding | 8.0h | 45m | 5m | 10.7x |
| 14 | Coding | 8.0h | 45m | 5m | 10.7x |
| 15 | Coding | 8.0h | 45m | 5m | 10.7x |
| 16 | Coding | 8.0h | 45m | 5m | 10.7x |
| 17 | Coding | 3.5h | 22m | 5m | 9.5x |
| 18 | Coding | 6.0h | 40m | 5m | 9.0x |
| 19 | Coding | 8.0h | 55m | 5m | 8.7x |
| 20 | Pre-filing semantic/legal review of AVIAN CIP [ip] drafts DD ([ip-cluster]) and EE (Pylon) | 4.0h | 28m | 5m | 8.6x |
| 21 | Coding | 4.0h | 28m | 3m | 8.6x |
| 22 | Coding | 4.0h | 28m | 5m | 8.6x |
| 23 | Audit and review | 4.0h | 30m | 5m | 8.0x |
| 24 | Debugging | 8.0h | 65m | 5m | 7.4x |
| 25 | Coding | 4.0h | 35m | 5m | 6.9x |
| 26 | Coding | 4.0h | 35m | 5m | 6.9x |
| 27 | Audit and review | 3.0h | 28m | 5m | 6.4x |
| 28 | Coding | 8.0h | 75m | 5m | 6.4x |
| 29 | Coding | 2.0h | 20m | 5m | 6.0x |
| 30 | Coding | 4.0h | 45m | 5m | 5.3x |
| 31 | Coding | 3.0h | 35m | 5m | 5.1x |
| 32 | Coding | 2.5h | 30m | 5m | 5.0x |
| 33 | Coding | 5.0h | 60m | 5m | 5.0x |
Aggregate Statistics
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Total tasks | 33 |
| Total human-equivalent hours | 1,301.0 |
| Total Claude minutes | 1,622 |
| Total supervisory minutes | 156 |
| Total tokens | 30,435,000 |
| Weighted average leverage factor | 48.1x |
| Weighted average supervisory leverage factor | 500.4x |
| Human-equivalent weeks | 32.5 |
Analysis
The highest factor of the day came in at 174.2x and the lowest at 5.0x, a spread of 34.8 times between the two. That is a wide range for a single day, and it usually means the day mixed mechanical work with work that needed real judgement.
The largest single entry accounted for 180.0 of the 1,301.0 human-equivalent hours, or 14 percent of the day. No single task dominated the total, so the weighted average is representative.
Supervisory time was 156 minutes against 1,622 minutes of execution, a ratio of about 1 to 10. Supervisory leverage of 500.4x is the figure I find most honest, because it measures the hours I actually spent rather than the hours a machine spent on my behalf.
Every figure here is recorded at the time the work is done rather than reconstructed afterwards. The human estimate is my own judgement and carries the uncertainty that implies; the minutes and tokens are measured. The full dataset, including this day, is available for download.