One task. May 26, 2026 weighted to 144.0x leverage across 60.0 human-equivalent hours in 25 Claude-minutes. Supervisory leverage closed at 720.0x.
1.5 weeks of human-equivalent throughput in 0.4 hours of Claude wall-clock. The 144.0x ceiling came from Author two world-class certification-domain specifications.; the 144.0x floor sat at Author two world-class certification-domain specifications..
Task Log
| # | Task | Human Est. | Claude | Sup. | Factor | Sup. Factor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Author two world-class certification-domain specifications. | 60.0h | 25m | 5m | 144.0x | 720.0x |
Aggregate Statistics
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Total tasks | 1 |
| Total human-equivalent hours | 60.0 |
| Total Claude minutes | 25 |
| Total supervisory minutes | 5 |
| Total tokens | 175,000 |
| Weighted average leverage factor | 144.0x |
| Weighted average supervisory leverage factor | 720.0x |
| Human-equivalent weeks | 1.5 |
Analysis
The day's leverage distribution matters more than the headline figure. The 144.0x ceiling came from Author two world-class certification-domain specifications.; the 144.0x floor was Author two world-class certification-domain specifications.. Tasks at the top of the distribution share a shape: tightly-scoped specifications, clear success criteria, and minimal integration ambiguity. The AI doesn't need to discover anything new; it executes against an explicit target.
Tasks at the bottom run differently. They're either bounded by review-heavy work where every step gets verified, or they involve ambiguity that demands several rounds of trial and adjustment. The factor is real and informative, not a failure mode.
The supervisory leverage figure (720.0x today) tracks something orthogonal to wall-clock leverage. It's the ratio of human-equivalent output to human prompt-writing time. It stays high even on lower-leverage days because supervisory minutes scale with task count, not with the human-hour estimate; a 20-minute task and a 4-hour task can both be specified in two minutes of human prompt-writing.
Across the 1 task, the day produced roughly 1.5 weeks of senior-engineer-equivalent throughput in 0.4 hours of model wall-clock. That ratio is the practical answer to the question of how much output a single operator can move per day when the model handles the execution and the operator handles the direction.